Cultural Revolution Self Criticism As A Force For Good - Cultural Revolution Self Criticism As A Force For Good -

Cultural Revolution Self Criticism As A Force For Good

cultural revolution self criticism

What is a cultural revolution? It is the process by which a group or faction of people modify their culture, values and norms to suit the needs and desires of the masses. This modification can be done slowly over a long period of time, or it can come about suddenly. What is important is that the cultural revolution does not destroy the society as a whole, but rather, helps to enhance the culture and values of the people. It is for this reason that cultural revolution is closely associated with revolutionary movements.

Self Criticism Is Useful In The Elimination Of Errors And Deviations

A person sitting in a dark room

Why should we examine self-criticism in terms of its relationship with cultural revolution? Self criticism is useful in the elimination of errors and deviations which are damaging the progress of the revolution. It is an extremely effective means of improving your knowledge and skill. You will gain a wide knowledge and understanding of the particular discipline, which will in turn help you improve your personal and collective performance.

How is self-criticism different from cultural revolution? The difference lies in the fact that the former promotes and encourages learning, whereas the latter tends to propagate certain values and norms. A good leader is one who guides his team towards the achievement of a common goal. On the other hand, a good cultural revolutionist is one who criticizes current practices and values, while trying to promote change and improvement. The main difference between these two is the way they use moral judgements and personal evaluation. A cultural revolutionist would compare current practices with the ideals which are preached by the founder of the revolution.

An Infringement Of Their Right To Freedom Of Expression

A person wearing a hat talking on a cell phone

Some critics of a given culture may see rectification as an infringement of their right to freedom of expression. They can do this by physically going into the field or demanding change in the milieu. On the other hand, self-criticism focuses more on the damage that is being done to the reputation of that culture. A cultural revolutionist would go to great lengths to correct the faults in the minds of his or her followers.

Critics of a given culture can tend to adopt various means in order to get their point across. They could adopt open debate, make use of journals and newspapers, or exhibit their views in public. Some critics would even go as far as to challenge the very values that they uphold. This is because culture, particularly in larger communities, tends to be highly localized.

Self Criticism Is Useful For Such Revolutionary Lists

Self criticism is useful for such revolutionary lists because it helps them gain greater insight into the minds of their followers. It gives them an opportunity to see for themselves if their value system is indeed desirable. For some cultural revolutionists, criticism is used more as a weapon than a means of improving the system on the whole. The best way for critics to deal with the problems of a given culture is to show that the values of that community are not inherently evil.

For this reason, it is not uncommon for certain critics of a given culture to be brutally honest while criticizing its value system. At the same time, they may not advocate for changes in a community because doing so would jeopardize their ability to criticize the values of the community. For this reason, some critics of a given culture would actually prefer for the revolution to occur without any type of change taking place at all. In other words, they might view this as a form of Machiavellian tactics.


Thus, for the critics of a cultural revolution to be effective, they must be aware that their actions are not only spontaneous but often motivated by what they perceive as legitimate self interest. This means that while they might not enjoy being part of the culture, critics must be willing to critique that culture in order to make others see that there are problems within it. By doing this, the critics themselves are helping make the revolution a success. While there is no way to guarantee that a cultural revolution will bring about positive results across the board, it does demonstrate that the existence of problems exists and is being actively addressed.

Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter